Saturday, 12 March 2022 14:50

慈愛天父何等愛我 何明珍姐妹感恩分享

Written by
Rate this item
(0 votes)
耶和華所賜的福,使人富足,並不加上憂慮。(箴言10:22)
	2013年我在「迦南聖經學院」完成了三年神學學習裝備,並在播恩堂完成了六個月的實習傳道,感謝神帶領我來到這個屬靈的家。若不是天父的揀選,我今天會身在何方?必仍然在塵世中營營役役為了餬口,而不知道神的豐富,神的愛。仍然在茫茫人海漂泊浮沉,要抓住看得見的享樂和物質,成為失落的一群。感謝神,大能的膀臂提昇我,拯救我,引領我回家,作祂的子民,成為祂的兒女,敬畏、信靠祂。
	我是出生在馬來西亞的第二代華僑,父母因戰爭逃難,離開家鄉來到南洋,定居在馬來西亞。母親懷了我時,因為家庭困難,父親好賭,而且已經有兩個哥哥和兩個姊姊,母親試用很多方法墮胎。當時服用了民間的墮胎藥,身體承受不了,雖然母親的身體有很大的反應,但是神卻保守了她及腹中的胎兒。因此,我的出生成為家裡不受歡迎的人物,從小,我總覺得我是從垃圾堆裡撿回來的棄兒。母親告訴我,她生下了我,心裏有多少擔憂和後悔,因為服用了有害的墮胎藥,不知道孩子能不能有健康的身體,若是心智不全,她是何等內疚!感謝神早在母腹中就保守了我。「我的肺腑是你所造的,我在母腹中,你已覆庇我,我要稱謝你,因我受造奇妙可畏,你的作為奇妙。」(詩139:13-14)神的憐憫,臨到我家,神的意念,是賜福的意念。
	因為我是家裡第一個信耶穌的,祖祖輩輩的傳統是拜偶像,祭祖先。神帶領我來到美國,我在美國有了第一本聖經,也開始每周五參加查經班,風雪不改。而且傳道人會為未信主的我禱告,經過了一整年的閱讀查經,神的話在我心中感動。1999年我決志接受了浸禮,公開宣告接受耶穌做我個人的主,願意一生跟隨祂。自從信主以後,原來我每天飯後一支菸,第二天中飯後,我拿起菸,想起這是神不喜悅的,立即把菸滅了,一直到今天沒有再抽過一支菸。耶穌說:「若有人在基督裡,他就是新造的人」,新造的人要靠耶穌的能力,勝過舊人,勝過老我。
	當時我住在一個800呎的公寓,分租與一個同鄉女士,後來我見她是拜拜的,不應該和她同一個居所。我在客廳掛著;「你要專心仰賴耶和華,不可倚靠自己的聰明。」每日早晨出門,每晚回家進門,這句話,這幅大字,都是我的提醒。我就請這位室友搬出去,並祈求神給我一個合適的室友。凡事我都先禱告才行動。後來,有人介紹一個女士給我,不料神沒有照我所求,給我一個合我心願的房客,反而趁著我上班,在家開傳銷大會。以後我發現了,請她搬家,她卻不肯搬走。最後,我只好放棄這個租金管制的房子,把房子還給了房東。這個時候,找不到這樣條件的房子,結果我買了一個合作公寓。想不到二個月後,房價上漲了二萬,一看,房子是會下蛋的母雞,我開始買兩家庭,原來神用這樣的方式,使我得益處。「我們曉得萬事都互相效力,叫愛神的人得益處,就是按祂旨意被召的人(羅8:28)。」如果我當時埋怨神,為甚麼不聽我的禱告,我為要討神喜悅,神卻給我惡房客?神說:“凡事謝恩”,我不管好事壞事,都相信神的意念是賜福的意念,我一點都沒有發怨言。聖經「民數記」記載,凡發怨言的都倒斃在曠野,聖經的話成為我的警戒。
	信主以後,生活上雖不是一帆風順,卻能從每一個困難經歷神所賜出人意外的平安,使我更多渴慕和追求,並選讀一些神學院的課程。在下班後,每週一天或兩天去上課,非常的喜樂,並享受這樣的忙碌,這樣的滿足。想不到卻在這個時候,神用一個很特別的方式呼召我,作全時間的學習裝備。一天我從商場出來,走過停車場,一部車子迎著我,有人叫我,並告訴我她的名字。哦,我想起來了,我們好久不見了,我請她到我家裡來敘舊。正談話中,她手機響了,她跟對方說遇見了老朋友,然後我接過手機,跟對方問候了幾句,對方說起方言,像小時候在馬來西亞聽過的印度話。我說;對方說印度話我聽不懂,朋友馬上接過手機並要了紙筆,把話寫下來,說是神要提昇我,要帶我到一個我沒去過的地方,那些人,我不認識的,那些語言,我沒聽過的。我以為神要帶我去旅遊,便把這事放一邊。
	2008年一個機會,我參加「迦南聖經學院」的體驗營,當時正好是德國人差會的75週年紀念。有三百多位不同地方德國人宣教士參與盛會,使用德文在室外大堂唱詩、讀經、禱告。禱告完畢,我一抬頭,全是金髮藍眼,一個都不認識,一個中國人都不在其中。腦海一閃,大半年前有人給我說的方言,就是這幅景象,眼前的人、事、物都呈現了。參加這個體驗營,住在神的殿中,教堂樓上有學生宿舍,神在這裡給我顯明祂要我做全時間的學習。我說:「主,我不配,我只要做業餘的參與傳福音。」然而,神卻讓我看到一切豐盛都是神給的,「若不是耶和華建造房屋,建造的人就枉然勞力。」
	神並使我看見小時候家門前的一棵芒果樹,從我有記憶起,就知道這棵樹每年只開花不結果,因為樹美又好乘涼,所以也保留著。想不到有一年卻結果纍纍,然而我們不懂得感謝神。第二年又結果纍纍,卻全是壞的,以後就不再結果子了。本來這些事我早就忘了,卻在這晚神打開我心靈的眼睛,得以看見。雖然花開了,若不是神賜福也得不到好果子。「你們清晨早起,夜晚安歇,吃勞碌得來的飯,本是枉然。惟有耶和華所喜愛的,必叫他安然睡覺。」(詩127:2)
	聖經說:「人活著不是單靠食物,乃是靠神口裡所出的一切話。」來美國前,所想的都是美金,信主以後,懂得想我所做的蒙神喜悅嗎?是的,我尊神在我心中居首位,掌王權,這位神,使我生命改變,使我靠著祂勝過試探和引誘,使我能成為一盞明燈照亮週圍的人,使我年老的母親臨終前信主,生命改變。願神使用我在未來的日子,作更合神心意的事,感謝神,為我預備了「迦南聖經學院」,使我完成三年的屬靈裝備。若不是祂大能清楚的引領,可能我已經半途被淘汰了。同學們都來自不同家庭、背景,卻一同學習,雖然會有磨擦,有傷害,也有撒旦的攻擊,若沒有神清楚的帶領、保守,三年時間如何能有足夠的忍耐?被淘汰的機率是不小的,感謝神,祂有無限的恩賜。
	一切榮耀與讚美都歸給有恩慈、憐憫的神。因祂使萬事互相效力。「神所賜的福,使人富足,並不加上憂慮。」(箴10:22)


靈修心得
司徒伍幗平姐妹
	**健康的身體,需要正常的新陳代謝作用。同樣屬靈的生命也要有所「領受」,就有所「付出」。當我們嘗道主恩的美善,怎能閉口不言!把救恩介紹給別人,不斷分享主的愛,將使靈命更新、成長,並且得到主的稱許。
	**有所割捨才有所得著,舊的生命必須先埋葬,新的生命才能生長,當你脫去舊人,穿上新人的時候,就是踏上蒙福之路。
	**神給我們眼睛、耳朵、嘴巴,祂要我們常常看見並經歷神恩。注意靜聽聖靈的微聲細語,並且唱出讚美的詩篇,獻上感謝的禱告,這樣我們就得保守自己常在主的愛中。
	**當你被別人誤解,受到毀謗時,難免心懷委屈,但是你若體貼聖靈就能說:「父啊!赦免他們,因為他們所做的,他們不曉得。」(路:22:-34)這樣你就能登上屬靈的高山,以基督的心為心,必得主的祝福與獎賞。


	

Warning: count(): Parameter must be an array or an object that implements Countable in /home/bcbcus/public_html/templates/rt_chimera/html/com_k2/templates/default/item.php on line 248
Read 78145 times

23700 comments

  • Comment Link Pedrorow Saturday, 11 January 2025 20:01 posted by Pedrorow

    Chile’s President Boric leads journey to South Pole in historic trip
    kraken darknet

    Chile’s President Gabriel Boric travelled to Antarctica’s South Pole on Friday, a place where no other Latin American president has set foot, according to the Chilean government.

    Boric led the historic two-day trip, named Operation Pole Star III, to extend the environmental monitoring of pollutants on Antarctica, Chile’s government said in a statement.

    He travelled with scientists, armed forces commanders and government ministers from the Chilean capital of Santiago to Punta Arenas, a city in southern Chile, public broadcaster Television Nacional de Chile (TVN) reported. From there, they made several stops before finally reaching the US-run Amundsen-Scott South Pole Station, according to TVN.
    https://kra23s.cc
    kraken тор браузер

    Chile is one of seven countries that has a territorial claim in Antarctica, alongside Argentina, Australia, France, New Zealand, Norway and the United Kingdom.

    It is also a signatory of the Antarctic Treaty, which dictates that the continent may only be used for peaceful and scientific purposes.

    While Chile has historically carried out scientific activity in Antarctica’s northern sector, the country’s government is now hoping to expand research into the west of the continent, its statement said.
    Boric called his trip to the South Pole an “honor” and a source of pride, TVN reported.

    “This is a milestone for us. It is the first time a Chilean and Latin American President has visited the South Pole,” he said, according to TVN.

  • Comment Link Hermanlieby Saturday, 11 January 2025 19:56 posted by Hermanlieby

    A year ago today, things went from bad to worse for Boeing
    Площадка кракен

    At 5 p.m. PT on January 5, 2024, Boeing seemed like a company on the upswing. It didn’t last. Minutes later, a near-tragedy set off a full year of problems.

    As Alaska Airlines flight 1282 climbed to 16,000 feet in its departure from Portland, Oregon, a door plug blew out near the rear of the plane, leaving a gaping hole in the fuselage. Phones and clothing were ripped away from passengers and sent hurtling into the night sky. Oxygen masks dropped, and the rush of air twisted seats next to the hole toward the opening.
    https://kra23c.cc
    kraken darknet onion
    Fortunately, those were among the few empty seats on the flight, and the crew got the plane on the ground without any serious injuries. The incident could have been far worse — even a fatal crash.

    Not much has gone right for Boeing ever since. The company has had one misstep after another, ranging from embarrassing to horrifying. And many of the problems are poised to extend into 2025 and perhaps beyond.

    The problems were capped by another Boeing crash in South Korea that killed 179 people on December 29 in what was in the year’s worst aviation disaster. The cause of the crash of a 15-year old Boeing jet flown by Korean discount carrier Jeju Air is still under investigation, and it is quite possible that Boeing will not be found liable for anything that led to the tragedy.
    But unlike the Jeju crash, most of the problems of the last 12 months have clearly been Boeing’s fault.

    And 2024 was the sixth straight year of serious problems for the once proud, now embattled company, starting with the 20-month grounding of its best selling plane, the 737 Max, following two fatal crashes in late 2018 and early 2019, which killed 346 people.

    Still the outlook for 2024 right before the Alaska Air incident had been somewhat promising. The company had just achieved the best sales month in its history in December 2023, capping its strongest sales year since 2018.

    It was believed to be on the verge of getting Federal Aviation Administration approval for two new models, the 737 Max 7 and Max 10, with airline customers eager to take delivery. Approvals and deliveries of its next generation widebody, the 777X, were believed to be close behind. Its production rate had been climbing and there were hopes that it could be on the verge of returning to profitability for the first time since 2018.

  • Comment Link MosesHaf Saturday, 11 January 2025 19:53 posted by MosesHaf

    The survivors of recent crashes were sitting at the back of the plane. What does that tell us about airplane safety?
    kraken вход

    Look at the photos of the two fatal air crashes of the last two weeks, and amid the horror and the anguish, one thought might come to mind for frequent flyers.

    The old frequent-flyer adage is that sitting at the back of the plane is a safer place to be than at the front — and the wreckage of both Azerbaijan Airlines flight 8243 and Jeju Air flight 2216 seem to bear that out.
    https://kra23c.cc
    kraken market
    The 29 survivors of the Azeri crash were all sitting at the back of the plane, which split into two, leaving the rear half largely intact. The sole survivors of the South Korean crash, meanwhile, were the two flight attendants in their jumpseats in the very tail of the plane.

    So is that old adage — and the dark humor jokes about first and business class seats being good until there’s a problem with the plane — right after all?

    In 2015, TIME Magazine reporters wrote that they had combed through the records of all US plane crashes with both fatalities and survivors from 1985 to 2000, and found in a meta-analysis that seats in the back third of the aircraft had a 32% fatality rate overall, compared with 38% in the front third and 39% in the middle third.

    Even better, they found, were middle seats in that back third of the cabin, with a 28% fatality rate. The “worst” seats were aisles in the middle third of the aircraft, with a 44% fatality rate.
    But does that still hold true in 2024?

    According to aviation safety experts, it’s an old wives’ tale.

    “There isn’t any data that shows a correlation of seating to survivability,” says Hassan Shahidi, president of the Flight Safety Foundation. “Every accident is different.”

    “If we’re talking about a fatal crash, then there is almost no difference where one sits,” says Cheng-Lung Wu, associate professor at the School of Aviation of the University of New South Wales, Sydney.

    Ed Galea, professor of fire safety engineering at London’s University of Greenwich, who has conducted landmark studies on plane crash evacuations, warns, “There is no magic safest seat.”

  • Comment Link Harrybiore Saturday, 11 January 2025 19:52 posted by Harrybiore

    Most plane crashes are ‘survivable’
    kraken войти
    First, the good news. “The vast majority of aircraft accidents are survivable, and the majority of people in accidents survive,” says Galea. Since 1988, aircraft — and the seats inside them — must be built to withstand an impact of up to 16G, or g-force up to 16 times the force of gravity. That means, he says, that in most incidents, “it’s possible to survive the trauma of the impact of the crash.”

    For instance, he classes the initial Jeju Air incident as survivable — an assumed bird strike, engine loss and belly landing on the runway, without functioning landing gear. “Had it not smashed into the concrete reinforced obstacle at the end of the runway, it’s quite possible the majority, if not everyone, could have survived,” he says.

    The Azerbaijan Airlines crash, on the other hand, he classes as a non-survivable accident, and calls it a “miracle” that anyone made it out alive.
    https://kra23c.cc
    kraken вход
    Most aircraft involved in accidents, however, are not — as suspicion is growing over the Azerbaijan crash — shot out of the sky.

    And with modern planes built to withstand impacts and slow the spread of fire, Galea puts the chances of surviving a “survivable” accident at at least 90%.

    Instead, he says, what makes the difference between life and death in most modern accidents is how fast passengers can evacuate.

    Aircraft today must show that they can be evacuated in 90 seconds in order to gain certification. But a theoretical evacuation — practiced with volunteers at the manufacturers’ premises — is very different from the reality of a panicked public onboard a jet that has just crash-landed.
    Galea, an evacuation expert, has conducted research for the UK’s Civil Aviation Authority (CAA) looking at the most “survivable” seats on a plane. His landmark research, conducted over several years in the early 2000s, looked at how passengers and crew behaved during a post-crash evacuation, rather than looking at the crashes themselves. By compiling data from 1,917 passengers and 155 crew involved in 105 accidents from 1977 to 1999, his team created a database of human behavior around plane crashes.

    His analysis of which exits passengers actually used “shattered many myths about aircraft evacuation,” he says. “Prior to my study, it was believed that passengers tend to use their boarding exit because it was the most familiar, and that passengers tend to go forward. My analysis of the data demonstrated that none of these myths were supported by the evidence.”

  • Comment Link StacyAnach Saturday, 11 January 2025 19:52 posted by StacyAnach

    Scientists have identified an estimated 10% of all species on Earth. Here’s what they found in 2024
    kraken вход

    A toothy toadstool. A vegetarian piranha with a distinctive mark. And a pygmy pipehorse floating in the Indian Ocean shallows.

    These wild wonders were among the hundreds of previously unknown species of animals, plants and fungi that scientists named and described for the first time in 2024, expanding our surprisingly limited knowledge of Earth’s diversity.

    “Scientists estimate that we’ve identified only one-tenth of all species on Earth,” said Dr.
    Shannon Bennett, chief of science at the California Academy of Sciences, in a statement.

    https://kra23c.cc
    кракен онион
    “While it is critical to place protections on known threatened species, we must also allocate resources towards identifying unknown species that may be just as important to the functioning of an ecosystem,” Bennett said.

    Researchers connected to the institution described 138 new species in 2024, including 32 fish. One standout was a pygmy pipehorse named Cylix nkosi. The seahorse relative was originally found in 2021 in the cool temperate waters surrounding the North Island of New Zealand, but the species described this year was discovered in the subtropical waters off South Africa, expanding the known range of this group to the Indian Ocean

    “South African reefs present notoriously difficult diving conditions with rough weather and intense, choppy waves — we knew we only had one dive to find it,” underwater photographer and marine biologist Richard Smith said in a statement.
    “This species is also quite cryptic, about the size of a golf tee, but luckily we spotted a female camouflaged against some sponges about a mile offshore on the sandy ocean floor.”

    The researchers involved in describing the new species chose nkosi as its name. A reference to the local Zulu word for “chief,” the name reflects the species’ crown-like head shape and acknowledges South Africa’s KwaZulu-Natal province where it was found.

  • Comment Link BryanSut Saturday, 11 January 2025 19:31 posted by BryanSut

    New Glenn’s first flight
    Blue Origin formally announced the development of New Glenn — which aims to outpower SpaceX’s Falcon 9 rockets and haul spacecraft up to 45 metric tons (99,200 pounds) to orbit — in 2016.
    кракен онион
    The vehicle is long overdue, as the company previously targeted 2020 for its first launch.

    Delays, however, are common in the aerospace industry. And the debut flight of a new vehicle is almost always significantly behind schedule.

    Rocket companies also typically take a conservative approach to the first liftoff, launching dummy payloads such as hunks of metal or, as was the case with SpaceX’s Falcon Heavy debut in 2018, an old cherry red sports car.
    https://kra23att.cc
    kraken market
    Blue Origin has also branded itself as a company that aims to take a slow, diligent approach to rocket development that doesn’t “cut any corners,” according to Bezos, who founded Blue Origin and funds the company.

    The company’s mascot is a tortoise, paying homage to “The Tortoise and the Hare” fable that made the “slow and steady wins the race” mantra a childhood staple.

    “We believe slow is smooth and smooth is fast,” Bezos said in 2016. Those comments could be seen as an attempt to position Blue Origin as the anti-SpaceX, which is known to embrace speed and trial-and-error over slow, meticulous development processes.
    But SpaceX has certainly won the race to orbit. The company’s first orbital rocket, the Falcon 1, made a successful launch in September 2008. The company has deployed hundreds of missions to orbit since then.

    And while SpaceX routinely destroys rockets during test flights as it begins developing a new rocket, the company has a solid track record for operational missions. SpaceX’s Falcon 9 rocket, for example, has experienced two in-flight failures and one launchpad explosion but no catastrophic events during human missions.

  • Comment Link RogerScoox Saturday, 11 January 2025 19:15 posted by RogerScoox

    What New Glenn will do
    In some ways, New Glenn has already made its mark on the launch industry. Blue Origin has for years pitched the rocket to compete with both SpaceX and United Launch Alliance — a joint venture of Boeing and Lockheed Martin that buys engines from Blue Origin — for lucrative military launch contracts.
    omg зеркало
    The US Space Force selected Blue Origin, ULA and SpaceX in June to compete for $5.6 billion worth of Pentagon contracts for national security missions slated to launch over the next four years.
    Blue Origin also has deals with several commercial companies to launch satellites. The contracts include plans to help deploy Amazon’s Kuiper internet satellites and a recently inked deal with AST SpaceMobile to help launch the Midland, Texas-based company’s space-based cellular broadband network.

    New Glenn could also be instrumental in building Blue Origin’s planned space station, called Orbital Reef. Blue Origin and it commercial partners, including Sierra Space and Boeing, among others, hope the station will one day provide a new destination for astronauts as the International Space Station is phased out of service.
    https://omgprice10.com
    omg официальный сайт
    New Glenn vs. other powerful rockets
    New Glenn packs significant power. Dubbed a “heavy-lift” vehicle, its capabilities lie between SpaceX’s Falcon 9 rocket and the more powerful Falcon Heavy launch vehicle.

    SpaceX’s workhorse Falcon 9, for example, can haul up to 22.8 metric tons (50,265 pounds) to space. While New Glenn is capable of carrying about double that mass, it may also be roughly the same price as a Falcon 9: reportedly around $60 million to $70 million per launch.

    “I think in order to compete with Falcon 9, you have to go head-to-head or better on price,” said Caleb Henry, the director of research at Quilty Space, which provides data and analysis about the space sector.

    The question, however, is whether Blue Origin will be able to sustain a competitive price point, Henry added.

    Still, one feature that makes New Glenn stand out is its large payload fairing, or nose cone. The component protects the cargo bay and is a whopping 23 feet (7 meters) wide — nearly 6 feet (2 meters) larger than that of SpaceX’s Falcon 9 or Falcon Heavy.

    Henry said Blue Origin likely opted to outfit New Glenn with such a large fairing in order to help fulfill Bezos’ vision of the future.

  • Comment Link JerryTig Saturday, 11 January 2025 19:05 posted by JerryTig

    Chile’s President Boric leads journey to South Pole in historic trip
    kraken

    Chile’s President Gabriel Boric travelled to Antarctica’s South Pole on Friday, a place where no other Latin American president has set foot, according to the Chilean government.

    Boric led the historic two-day trip, named Operation Pole Star III, to extend the environmental monitoring of pollutants on Antarctica, Chile’s government said in a statement.

    He travelled with scientists, armed forces commanders and government ministers from the Chilean capital of Santiago to Punta Arenas, a city in southern Chile, public broadcaster Television Nacional de Chile (TVN) reported. From there, they made several stops before finally reaching the US-run Amundsen-Scott South Pole Station, according to TVN.
    https://kra23s.cc
    kraken onion

    Chile is one of seven countries that has a territorial claim in Antarctica, alongside Argentina, Australia, France, New Zealand, Norway and the United Kingdom.

    It is also a signatory of the Antarctic Treaty, which dictates that the continent may only be used for peaceful and scientific purposes.

    While Chile has historically carried out scientific activity in Antarctica’s northern sector, the country’s government is now hoping to expand research into the west of the continent, its statement said.
    Boric called his trip to the South Pole an “honor” and a source of pride, TVN reported.

    “This is a milestone for us. It is the first time a Chilean and Latin American President has visited the South Pole,” he said, according to TVN.

  • Comment Link Glennwak Saturday, 11 January 2025 19:02 posted by Glennwak

    On a long-dormant pad in Florida, a rocket that could challenge SpaceX’s dominance is poised to launch
    kra cc

    On a Florida launchpad that has been dormant for almost two decades, a new, roughly 320-foot (98-meter) rocket — developed by Jeff Bezos’ company Blue Origin — is poised for its maiden flight.

    The uncrewed launch vehicle, called New Glenn, will mark Blue Origin’s first attempt to send a rocket to orbit, a feat necessary if the company hopes to chip away at SpaceX’s long-held dominance in the industry.

    New Glenn is set to lift off from Cape Canaveral Space Force Station as early as next week.
    https://kra23s.cc
    кракен даркнет
    The rocket, which stands about as tall as a 30-story building, consists of several parts: The first-stage rocket booster gives the initial thrust at liftoff. Atop the booster is an upper rocket stage that includes a cargo bay protected by a nose cone that will house experimental technology for this mission.

    And, in an attempt to replicate the success that SpaceX has found reusing rocket boosters over the past decade, Blue Origin will also aim to guide New Glenn’s first-stage rocket booster back to a safe landing on a seafaring platform — named Jacklyn for Bezos’ mother — minutes after takeoff.

    Like SpaceX, Blue Origin will seek to recover, refurbish and reuse first-stage rocket boosters to drive down costs.

    For this inaugural mission, a smooth flight is not guaranteed.

    But the eventual success of New Glenn, named after storied NASA astronaut John Glenn, is instrumental to some of Blue Origin’s most ambitious goals.

    The rocket could one day power national security launches, haul Amazon internet satellites to space and even help in the construction of a space station that Blue Origin is developing with commercial partners.

  • Comment Link EugeneIdedo Saturday, 11 January 2025 18:59 posted by EugeneIdedo

    The survivors of recent crashes were sitting at the back of the plane. What does that tell us about airplane safety?
    kraken ссылка

    Look at the photos of the two fatal air crashes of the last two weeks, and amid the horror and the anguish, one thought might come to mind for frequent flyers.

    The old frequent-flyer adage is that sitting at the back of the plane is a safer place to be than at the front — and the wreckage of both Azerbaijan Airlines flight 8243 and Jeju Air flight 2216 seem to bear that out.
    https://kra23c.cc
    kraken shop
    The 29 survivors of the Azeri crash were all sitting at the back of the plane, which split into two, leaving the rear half largely intact. The sole survivors of the South Korean crash, meanwhile, were the two flight attendants in their jumpseats in the very tail of the plane.

    So is that old adage — and the dark humor jokes about first and business class seats being good until there’s a problem with the plane — right after all?

    In 2015, TIME Magazine reporters wrote that they had combed through the records of all US plane crashes with both fatalities and survivors from 1985 to 2000, and found in a meta-analysis that seats in the back third of the aircraft had a 32% fatality rate overall, compared with 38% in the front third and 39% in the middle third.

    Even better, they found, were middle seats in that back third of the cabin, with a 28% fatality rate. The “worst” seats were aisles in the middle third of the aircraft, with a 44% fatality rate.
    But does that still hold true in 2024?

    According to aviation safety experts, it’s an old wives’ tale.

    “There isn’t any data that shows a correlation of seating to survivability,” says Hassan Shahidi, president of the Flight Safety Foundation. “Every accident is different.”

    “If we’re talking about a fatal crash, then there is almost no difference where one sits,” says Cheng-Lung Wu, associate professor at the School of Aviation of the University of New South Wales, Sydney.

    Ed Galea, professor of fire safety engineering at London’s University of Greenwich, who has conducted landmark studies on plane crash evacuations, warns, “There is no magic safest seat.”

Leave a comment

Make sure you enter all the required information, indicated by an asterisk (*). HTML code is not allowed.